|
Renaissance Problems
In case you haven't noticed, we are in the midst
of a second Renaissance! The first Renaissance occurred in the 15th
century spurred by the invention of movable type and the printing press
by Johannes Gutenberg. His first published book was, of course, the
Gutenberg Bible. Detailed records of Gutenberg's life and work are
scant; his name does not appear on any of the works attributed to him.
It appears as though he was born around the year 1400, in Mainz, and
trained as a goldsmith. However, his invention of the printing press
using movable type made books more easily available to the everyone. No
longer were they tucked away in monasteries for only priests to read and
copy.
Although there are several theories as to the
inception of the Renaissance, I believe the single most important
invention was Gutenberg's printing press. Knowledge could now spread
quickly and easily as compared to the previous centuries. I presume it
took about 100 years for books to spread about Europe, but when they
did, new ideas, inventions, thinking, etc. emerged at a record pace.
Everything was effected, including music and painting.
Lets look at the present.
Not since the fifteenth century have we seen as
sudden an increase in knowledge as we are now experiencing. The
invention that has made this phenomenal accelerated leap possible is, of
course, the Internet. It is utterly amazing that you can now get
information so quickly and easily! I remember my first introduction to
the Internet.
I was observing a then new operating system,
NeXT, which was supposed to be the ultimate in computer offerings. I
could not believe that the operator could go from Europe to Japan by
merely typing and entering an address. Not only that, he could download
information from these sites and it only took a few minutes!
I remember my college days when I struggled
in several libraries to gather information for term papers. Many times I
had to ask the librarians for help. Sometimes they could assist me, but
other times they were just as lost as I was.
Enter the Internet - I can now sit at my
computer, download information, print it off or import it into a word
processor and revise it into my own terminology in just a few minutes.
What took hours, perhaps days,
|
could now be accomplished in the proverbial wink of an eye.
With new advances, however, there are
problems. Certain material should not be available to selected
audiences. Actually, in my opinion, some material should not be
available to anyone! We don't need web sites advocating the annihilation
or debauchery of humanity, but how do we expunge them? How do we
prevent children from accessing them? How do we prevent mentally
disturbed individuals from accessing sites which intensely augment their
perverted penchants? There must be a line drawn between society's
guarantee of individual rights and the right for the society itself to
exist. In my opinion, when societal rights are threatened, the
individual rights must become subordinate. The problem is, however, who
is to be the judge for this donnybrook?
In the middle ages, the church purged
objectionable material and was quite successful for a time, but the
widespread availability of materials ended their control. I am not
advocating such control in our time, but some materials should not be
easily available. I had many an argument about censorship with fellow
librarians when I was a librarian. They believed that all materials
should be available. I always asked them the question, If a book
entitled, 'How to Make an Atom Bomb in 10 Easy Lessons' existed, written
in language easily understood by elementary school children, should it
be available in elementary school libraries? Needless to say, they
stuttered and stammered over that question. It proved my point, however,
that some things should not be readily available.
The mammoth growth of the Internet is
presenting problems which are beginning to effect all of us. I don't
like nor want any pornographic e-mail sent to me, but how do I prevent
it? The post office has ways of stopping such trash. Why not the
Internet? We need some way to control what comes into our homes. What is
your position on this controversial subject?
Finally, to quote an old but true saying,
Anything in the world can be used for good or evil. The avoidance of
evil, however, is to be encouraged.
Cliff Milford is editor of Blue Chips the
official newsletter of the Utah Computer Society. This article is
brought to you by the Editorial Committee of the Association of Personal
Computer User Groups (APCUG), an International organization to which
this user group belongs.
|